From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Oct 19 10:18:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB13037B41E; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 5528014C2E; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:18:33 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Mathias.Picker@virtual-earth.de Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware on current: Could not get addres for /dev/vmnet1 References: <20011019162909.39C5937B403@hub.freebsd.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 19 Oct 2001 19:18:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20011019162909.39C5937B403@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mathias.Picker@virtual-earth.de writes: > Has anyone seen similar problem on recent -current or has someone an > idea why vmware is issuing a SIOCGIFCONF ioctl without providing an > interface name? > > Oct 19 18:04:53 mp /boot/kernel/kernel: linux_ioctl_socket(): ioctl 35093 on To clarify, this is from debugging output I added to linux_ioctl.c, and it's supposed to print an interface name after "on". DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message