From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 10 00:05:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA05274 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 00:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.52]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA05267 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 00:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from richardc@localhost) by soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.12) id AAA09382; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 00:05:22 -0700 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 00:05:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Chang To: Michael Smith cc: j@uriah.heep.sax.de, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hard reading error In-Reply-To: <199604100722.QAA22259@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 10 Apr 1996, Michael Smith wrote: > Richard Chang stands accused of saying: > > > > > > Huh, they are rather low-level. I wonder how you managed to ``correct'' > > > them with NDD. Probably NDD did only include them into the DOS bad > > > sector list? > > > > NDD actually repaired it... > > I doubt it; if it _had_, you wouldn't have the problem now. NDD would > just have relocated whatever data it could recover and silently stuffed > the sector into the BSL. Hmmm, because NDD only will repair dos partitions and not other types of partitions so it might have done what you said... Richard