Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 01:19:31 -0600 From: "Mike Meyer" <mwm-dated-1015831171.a21ab0@mired.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. Message-ID: <15493.49923.458997.98416@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20020305164054.B38095@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020305201350.GC4820@hades.hell.gr> <20020305155850.A38095@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020306000806.GC6839@hades.hell.gr> <20020305164054.B38095@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> types: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 02:08:07AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > I was giving one. :-) > style(9) documents the practices of /sys. Thus we should not arbitaryly > add rules w/o them being backed up in code. As the original author of the PR, I'll point out that this chagne does *not* add rules. It clarifies the wording of a rule that's already there. If the rule is wrong, it should be removed. The reason I didn't post if for wider review was because it wasn't changing any rules. My thanks to Giorgos for moving this PR towards closure. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15493.49923.458997.98416>