Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:32:22 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving Things [was Re: List of things to move from main tree] Message-ID: <20010217153222.B8519@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <6905.982439197@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:46:37AM -0800 References: <kris@obsecurity.org> <6905.982439197@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:46:37AM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > There is nothing preventing us from installing the base system as > > packages right now, except that sysinstall demands those bits to be > > distributions. >=20 > I wish that were true. :( However, even that would only be a stop-gap > measure since we're still looking for something which incorporates > sources, binary packages and "distributions" into one unified design > here. What you and Marc are proposing doesn't represent the true > goal, it's just another step along the "hack it some more" path and > I'd like to get off that one now. So we're again off down that mythical PackageNG brick road again? Forgive me for being cynical that anything will come of it this iteration either :-( Kris --uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6jwoGWry0BWjoQKURAicIAJ9WD8QK/Cb67DbPW5CMSKE3e+XETgCgmqGL /ik87esowg6fTGlFe8IHS0Y= =N4Q9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010217153222.B8519>