From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr 25 12:12:50 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA08918
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:12:50 -0700
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA08910
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:12:50 -0700
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id MAA08039; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:12:38 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199504251912.MAA08039@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Gating hackers into the newsgroups
To: tinguely@plains.nodak.edu (Mark Tinguely)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199504251540.KAA03851@plains.nodak.edu> from "Mark Tinguely" at Apr 25, 95 10:40:57 am
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 442       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> we tried this news <-> mail gateway in the 386BSD days, and in my opinion
> it was a disaster. Eventually the mailling list was killed.
 We didn't try it ONE WAY.....
and I think 'hackers' should be gated ONE-WAY and 'anonymously..'
you can respond to the sender, but there should be no mention
of 'hackers' in the headers...
'quetions' on the other hand could be gated one way, with a 
Reply: to filed set to 'Answers'
> 
> --mark.
>