From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jun 27 22:25:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA07562
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 22:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (critter.cdrom.com [204.216.27.38])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA07556;
          Thu, 27 Jun 1996 22:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA01238; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 22:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPFW bugs? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Jun 1996 22:55:10 MDT."
             <199606280455.WAA13473@rocky.mt.sri.com> 
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 22:25:25 -0700
Message-ID: <1236.835939525@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199606280455.WAA13473@rocky.mt.sri.com>, Nate Williams writes:

># Allow NTP stuff through
>ipfw add pass all from any 123 to any via $1
>ipfw add pass all from any to any 123 via $1

>If I enable the below lines, I get LOG messages that are caused by something
>sendmail packets from port 125-127 on my box.  Why are they matching?

biff/comsat

DNS:  port 123 is NTP, DNS is port 53  (duh!  <:-)

>I'll go look at the code, but shipping this in -stable seems to be a big
>mistake, because both the code and documentation is broken. :(

Hey, lets teach the pilot a bit first, shall we ?


--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.