From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jan 31 02:15:42 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA21388
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 31 Jan 1998 02:15:42 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA21314
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 31 Jan 1998 02:15:38 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA06245;
	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 05:15:17 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from toor)
Message-Id: <199801311015.FAA06245@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: LFS is nuked?
In-Reply-To: <4362.886232468@critter.freebsd.dk> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Jan 31, 98 08:41:08 am"
To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 05:15:17 -0500 (EST)
Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, tlambert@primenet.com,
        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG>
Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current"

Poul-Henning Kamp said:
> In message <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman write
> s:
> ><<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.
> >com> said:
> >
> >> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's
> >> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and
> >> X.25 code have all been fixed...
> >
> >But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to
> >real users.
> 
> ... But appearantly not enough added value to make anybody actually
> make it work.
> 
> QED:  The attic is the right place.
> 
> And yes, personally I belive that portals & unionfs could go the same
> way...
> 
Actually, portals and unionfs are *much* closer to being worked on.


-- 
John                  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
dyson@freebsd.org     | it just makes you look stupid,
jdyson@nc.com         | and it irritates the pig.