From owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org  Sat Nov 18 17:48:46 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DE6DC06A4
 for <freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:48:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
 [128.95.76.21])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1F3772A5
 for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:48:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vAIHZLqF075779
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:35:21 -0800 (PST)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vAIHZLj5075778;
 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:35:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk)
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:35:21 -0800
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Dima Pasechnik <dimpase@gmail.com>
Cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu>,
 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>,
 "freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org" <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: cpow and clog
Message-ID: <20171118173521.GA75757@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
References: <20171106194937.GA87725@freebird>
 <20171106204121.GB37361@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <20171106213308.GA73787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <c4448deb-8ccf-60c2-f839-cc17ca047969@missouri.edu>
 <CAF6rxgnWg+m2fpAjy1kF6K5YkpzWF_pAC+qAHhu8oysEppibdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171108061501.GA51059@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <CAAWYfq2VHBjrczYE4cmAHgaTPqb_kKC13rut9L1isa2ZLL0WYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <20171109012259.GA6402@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <CAAWYfq0a4X7pPRwPQOCra-1nbZSsQqrGEHSAK3=rf4khtETgVA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAWYfq0a4X7pPRwPQOCra-1nbZSsQqrGEHSAK3=rf4khtETgVA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions."
 <freebsd-numerics.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-numerics>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:48:46 -0000

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 02:58:46PM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Steve Kargl
> <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:03:02AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >> >
> >> > A patch not tagged by a version control system surely  rots very quickly,
> >> > as noone except the submitter knows the exact state of the source tree it
> >> > is made against, especially if the tree is also not under a revision
> >> > control system.
> >> > And surely the submitter's memory is not perfect, either.
> >>
> >> The patch is against trunk on the day it was submitted.
> >> The patch was created under the officical revision control
> >> system used by FreeBSD.
> 
> Sorry, I have overlooked "revision" field in bugzilla patch, my bad.
> Can this be committed now?
> 

IMO, yes.  

-- 
Steve