From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 20:01:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DFA16A400 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 20:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru) Received: from mail.inse.ru (inse.ru [144.206.128.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DE313C447 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 20:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (www.inse.ru [144.206.128.1]) by mail.inse.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDFA33C4C; Wed, 16 May 2007 00:01:13 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <464A1366.3050809@inse.ru> Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:09:10 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Anderson References: <4649E0AD.4060705@inse.ru> <464A03E3.4040805@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <464A03E3.4040805@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEDSUP: man -k cleanup (man -k RAID, some bits are missing) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:01:15 -0000 Eric Anderson wrote: > On 05/15/07 11:32, Roman Kurakin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Trying to obtain information about supported RAID devices in >> the system via `man -k RAID` I've found that not all known >> by me devices are there. So a grep-ed a bit and going to commit >> the following patchset. I think that keyword RAID should present >> in description of all these man pages. But may be I am wrong? >> >> There is also some bits I was not able to fix. >> 1) Is it safe to s/Array/RAID/ in ida(4)? > > I don't think that's good - an array isn't necessarily a RAID, and a > s/r of that name yields bad results. I am about brief description (.Nd) only. If driver supports some RAID arrays it should be marked as such. So may be "Array" => "Array (including RAID)" in .Nd? >> 2) Is it safe to mark ciss as driver for RAID controllers? >> 3) Should be isp(4) marked as driver for RAID controllers? > But isp isn't a RAID controller, it's an HBA. Thanks for information. It was just counted by grep results ;-) rik >> 4) Should geom(4) be patched as suggested in my patch or >> it is enough of mentioning in corresponding class utilities? >> 5) Have I missed smth else? >> >> PS. I think that there is other such places where `man -k` is not >> complete, so its good todo idea, currently not for me ;-). >> PPS. Sorry for crossposting. I hope I included all affected parties. > > > Eric >