From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 06:26:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3458916A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out005.verizon.net (out005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CB143D1F for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm@inbox.lv) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.26.84.7]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20041224062651.BHYY28362.out005.verizon.net@ringworm.mechee.com> for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:26:51 -0600 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D072F2CE740; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:24:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:24:05 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20041223214205.H17211@fez.hyperreal.org> <20041224055954.GA88304@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041224055954.GA88304@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412232224.05536.ringworm@inbox.lv> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [4.26.84.7] at Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:26:51 -0600 Subject: Re: portsdb and portupgrade causes errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:26:52 -0000 On Thursday 23 December 2004 09:59 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:42:37PM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > >run make fetchindex not make fetch index from /usr/ports > > > > Out of curiosity, why isn't the index included in the update > > normally? > > It changes dozens of times per day, and the deltas would be enormous. > > Kris Way back when, I used to get the INDEX when running cvsup unless I put it in the refuse file. Of coarse it was old and useless so one was better off building their own INDEX. So why cant we just receive the INDEX like we used to, but unlike before, l have it updated as often as is being done now? -Mike