From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Jul 9 16:26:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA14734 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 16:26:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl (smtp1.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA14728 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 16:26:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from schofiel@xs4all.nl) Received: from xs1.xs4all.nl (root@xs1.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.42]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA22111 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 01:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from excelsior (enterprise.xs4all.nl [194.109.14.215]) by xs1.xs4all.nl (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id BAA25067 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 01:26:43 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <35A5518B.364B@xs4all.nl> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 01:26:03 +0200 From: Rob Schofield Reply-To: schofiel@xs4all.nl Organization: Knights of the Round Table, Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Oh dear... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes it's "We've been through this one before" time, so sorry in advance, guys. Although Fast Page and EDO memory are both DRAM, what's the real difference? Can EDO be parity, or non-parity? Or is this an oxymoron? Does the speed of EDO matter? If we have two FP and EDO blocks of the speed (say, 60ns), then which is better? Any opinions or comparisons would be welcome - but so would pointers to FAQs or decent comparitive articles so I can look it up myself. Thanks in advance, Rob Schofield To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message