From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 6 0:34:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FEE37BCF3; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 00:34:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA10224; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 01:05:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 01:05:53 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Sameer R. Manek" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdates and 3.4-stable Message-ID: <20000306010553.Q14279@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from manek@ecst.csuchico.edu on Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 11:24:38PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Sameer R. Manek [000305 23:57] wrote: > The readme file in /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/README.softupdates states the > following: > > : Tue May 19 16:20:27 PDT 1998 > : IMPORTANT NOTE: The Soft Updates code is currently in ALPHA test. > : Use at your own risk! > > Given the fact it is almost 2 years old now, is the code considered to be > out of alpha testing yet? Or does this still hold true? Perhaps someone > needs to > update this readme to reflect it's current status? > > A glance at the RCS tags suggests that the code hasn't been edited much > lately. The only reproducable bug was fixed a couple of weeks ago by Kirk and I backported it to -stable the same day. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message