From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 22:58:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1036106564A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1DE8FC08 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10227439; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:58:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.43.232] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10227437 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:58:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4DFFD0A7.8010806@radel.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:58:47 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201106202107.p5KL7PW0091851@x.it.okstate.edu> <4DFFC61B.2080201@radel.com> <27899_1308609017_4DFFC9F9_27899_767_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BF89C588@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> In-Reply-To: <27899_1308609017_4DFFC9F9_27899_767_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BF89C588@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer Subject: Re: Two Networks on one System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:58:57 -0000 On 6/20/11 6:30 PM, Gary Gatten wrote: > I was kinda going this route as well - policy based routing type thing, but, is there an "easier" way? Not that I know of given a constraint of completely disjoint networks. However, I won't be too terribly surprised if somebody comes up with something elegant that makes us all go, "Ooooooo, what a disgustingly neat hack." > > 1.) Temporarily enable ipforwarding - not my favorite > 2.) Instead of a second NIC, bind the new IP to the org nic (alias). > > man ifconfig specifically mentions using alias during ip renumbering: Yes, if you've got a single network and are renumbering it. As I understand it, the OP has 2 networks, which is an entirely different matter. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com