From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Feb 26 13:37:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA04889
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mpp@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA04882
          for freebsd-hackers; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:37:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Pritchard <mpp>
Message-Id: <199702262137.NAA04882@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: sig*set macros in <signal.h>
To: freebsd-hackers
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:37:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Is there a good reason for having the sig*set macros defined
in <signal.h> and the equivalent functions in libc?  The macros 
are only defined if _ANSI_SOURCE isn't.  Plus it doesn't looks like
they are used that much anyways (about 2 dozen programs).
-- 
Mike Pritchard
mpp@FreeBSD.org
"Go that way.  Really fast.  If something gets in your way, turn"