From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 07:19:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0190E106564A; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe02.c2i.net [212.247.154.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563798FC14; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:19:22 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50 Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 197516918; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:19:19 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:16:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5 %V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC( :AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110280916.16312.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: newbus IO ordering semantics - moving forward X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:19:23 -0000 On Thursday 27 October 2011 22:49:12 Adrian Chadd wrote: > I have no idea. Which architectures would benefit? Often PIO is rare with high performance devices. Usually data is moved using DMA. --HPS