From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 13:25:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0184A6FA for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 13:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [37.59.62.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0FD622 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 13:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr185083.univ-rennes1.fr (mr185083.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.185.83]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8C6036428; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:25:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mr185083 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mr185083.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887187498; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:25:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:25:31 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: "O'Connor, Daniel" Subject: Re: if_pflow from OpenBSD Message-ID: <20150109142531.573303b0@mr185083> In-Reply-To: <3E1BDE12-9A82-4849-AC52-A155C613C1A1@emc.com> References: <45056363-1E83-4318-B870-7F673993166B@emc.com> <20150108101744.2c2a9eae@mr185083> <9085F2E7-5429-4C16-86DB-7C3F04C993DC@emc.com> <20150109110207.45e280dd@mr185083> <3E1BDE12-9A82-4849-AC52-A155C613C1A1@emc.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp.lamaiziere.net [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:25:31 +0100 (CET) Cc: FreeBSD Hackers X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:25:35 -0000 Le Fri, 9 Jan 2015 08:09:21 -0500, "O'Connor, Daniel" a écrit : Hello, > > wrote: pflow(4) has the drawback to handle netflow only at the end > > of the session. > > Hmm, really? I looked at the code and it does have timeouts to emit > things, but perhaps I am misreading it. I believed that too but : http://misc.openbsd.narkive.com/pS5VJOyH/pflow-packets-before-state-expires See the Henning Brauer reply. Regards,