Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:02:10 +0800
From:      Michael Slater <mikey@iexpress.net.au>
To:        "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Fact or Fiction (Unix vs NT)
Message-ID:  <21EF26FF9AD8D01180E9BA3BC10000000EA13A@george1.iexpress.net.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi All,
    I realise this relates more to Linux, but in my company which if
full of NT Fanatics they are taking this as gospel and using it as an
argument that NT Rules and Linux and FreeBSD cant do the job! Can
anybody point me to similiar benchmarks that dispute the letter below ?

regards,

Michael Slater
Internet Express 

> LOS GATOS, Calif., April 13. Today, Mindcraft released the results 
> of a study comparing the performance of Red Hat Linux 5.2 (updated 
> to the Linux 2.2.2 kernel) and Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 
> operating systems. According to the report, Windows NT Server 
> provides over three and a half times the performance of Linux as a
> Web server.  Furthermore, the report shows that when testing Windows 
> NT Server and Linux as file servers, Windows NT Server provides over 
> two and a half times the performance of Linux.  The full report,
> including all of the details needed to reproduce the tests, is on
> Mindcraft's Web site at:
> 
> http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html.
> 
> Using benchmarks from Ziff-Davis Benchmark Operation (ZDBOp), the 
> report compares the peak performance levels of both Windows NT 
> Server and Linux configured both as a file server and a Web server.   
> 
> All tests were performed on a standard Dell PowerEdge 6300/400 server 
> with four 400-MHz Xeon CPUs, 1GB RAM (960MB for Linux -- this is the
> default maximum amount of RAM that Linux supports).  To simulate a 
> client load, Mindcraft used 144 physical client test systems; half 
> were running Windows 95 and the other half were running Windows 98.  
> 
> Both Linux and Windows NT Server were tuned to perform optimally under
> each of the two workloads.  "We started the tests using standard Red
> Hat
> Linux 5.2 but had to update it because it does not support hardware
> RAID
> controllers and SMP at the same time," said Mindcraft's president,
> Bruce
> Weiner.  "Linux definitely takes more time and resources to tune and
> to
> configure than Windows NT Server.  You have to search the Net to find
> the
> latest kernel and driver versions to get the highest performance and
> most
> reliable modules. Then when you're done, Linux fails to deliver the
> same
> level of performance as Windows NT Server on enterprise-class
> servers."
> 
> Mindcraft's report shows that using ZDBOp's WebBench 2.0 Web server
> benchmark, Windows NT Server and Internet Information Server (IIS) 4.0
> reach a peak of 3,771 requests/second and 22.4 Megabits/second(Mbps)
> of
> throughput. The report goes on to show that Linux and the Apache 1.3.4
> 
> Web server reach a peak of 1,000 request/second and 5.9 Mbps of
> throughput.  The WebBench 2.0 tests also revealed that there are
> problems
> with Linux/Apache at high client loads. "The Linux/Apache Web server
> performance collapsed with a WebBench load above 160 client test
> threads,
> while Windows NT Server/IIS continued to increase performance up
> through
> 288 client test threads without reaching their peak performance," adds
> 
> Mindcraft's Bruce Weiner.
> 
> To simulate a file server workload, Mindcraft used ZDBOp's NetBench 
> 5.01 benchmark.  The testing revealed that Windows NT Server
> performance
> peaked at 286.7 Mbps with 112 clients, while Linux running Samba 2.0.1
> peaked at 114.6 Mbps with only 48 clients.  "The integration of the
> SMB
> file sharing protocol with the multi-processor kernel is a key
> performance
> win for Windows NT Server," said Weiner. "Customers benefit every day
> from
> the superior scalability of Windows NT Server, which delivers vital
> file
> and web services at two to three times the performance of Linux as
> shown
> in these benchmarks," said Edmund Muth, Group Product Manager,
> Microsoft
> Corporation. "Empirical data like this helps customers and planners
> make
> informed decisions, and showcases the industrial strength technology
> and
> mature engineering of the Windows NT Server operating system."
> 
> About Mindcraft
> 
> Mindcraft is a service-oriented, independent test lab. The company was
> founded in 1985 to provide high quality services and products to
> vendors
> and end users who want to test software, system, and network products.
> Mindcraft is committed to work to promote standards in our industry.
> Mindcraft is the only test lab to be a member of the Standard
> Performance
> Evaluation Corporation (SPEC).
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21EF26FF9AD8D01180E9BA3BC10000000EA13A>