Date: Sun, 1 Nov 98 10:45:54 PST From: "D. Alex Neilson" <neilson@www.nugate.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Alex Neilson <neilson@nugate.com> Subject: Static Route, need help (was: Re: Static Route (Correction)) Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.4.909945954.neilson@www.nugate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 30 Oct 1998 19:24:16 %2B0000
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So, you can not do:
>
> route_bar="-host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff -interface epx"
>
> but you can ommit the ff's and do:
>
> route_bar="-host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -interface epx"
I wish that one could, as it would solve my problem:
With this configuration, to get A to talk to B, one could say on A
route add -host 192.168.67.67 -interface vx0
-------
| |
| A |
| |
-------
| 192.168.66.66 (vx0)
|
------------------------------------- ethernet (multiple nets)
|
|
| 192.168.67.67 (le0)
-------
| |
| B |
| |
-------
I get this route, but the gateway ethernet address is for host A:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif
192.168.67.67 0:60:8:4:4:ed UHLS 0 0 vx0
Of course, it doesn't work; strangely, if I try telnetting from B to A,
it'll pause for a moment, then let me in, with A giving this message
myhost /kernel: arp: 192.168.67.67 moved from \
00:60:08:04:04:ed to 08:00:20:73:87:89
and A now shows the route I wanted in the first place:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif
192.168.67.67 8:0:20:73:87:89 UHLS 1 55 vx0
Is there a way to get the latter route in the first place?
Thanks,
Alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CMM.0.90.4.909945954.neilson>