From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 30 13:57:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ducky.nz.freebsd.org (chilled.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCF337B6B6 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 13:57:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@freebsddiary.org) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by ducky.nz.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA59301; Wed, 31 May 2000 08:57:17 +1200 (NZST) Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:57:15 +1200 (NZST) From: Dan Langille X-Sender: dan@ducky.nz.freebsd.org To: Will Andrews Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: where did mail/qpopper3 come from? In-Reply-To: <20000530164958.B22499@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 30 May 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:43:25AM +1200, Dan Langille wrote: > > I noticed in my latest cvsup: > > > > Mkdir ports/mail/popper3/patches > > Create ports/mail/popper3/patches/patch-aa,v > > Create ports/mail/popper3/patches/patch-ab,v > > Create ports/mail/popper3/patches/patch-ac,v > > etc... > > > > But I see nothing in cvs-all pertaining to this. But checking > > cvs, I see that popper and popper3 appear to be mirror images (at least > > wrt the most recent commits). > > > > My question: should this "new" port have appeared in cvs-all? > > It is a repository copy. Repo-copies don't occur in a normal manner > (i.e. w/ cvs commit), but rather a cvs meister (i.e. Asami-san) must > copy the files directly in the repository. OK. That tells me what it is. I suspect the answer to my question is no. Then why do we have both popper and popper3? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message