Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:21:58 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213768] editors/libreoffice: Fix build with lang/gcc5 on 11.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <bug-213768-25061-QfUGVb13Kf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-213768-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-213768-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213768 --- Comment #11 from Kenneth Salerno <kennethsalerno@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Kenneth Salerno from comment #10) Just a little more detail about this patch: the actual failure comes from t= he -lboost_program_options link test conftest.cpp of autoconf's `configure'. The issue isn't that ld on conftest.o link doesn't find /usr/local/lib/libboost_program_options.so, the problem is yet another C++ header include issue/grief of using lang/gcc5 gnu++11 /usr/local/lib/gcc5/include on a std=3Dc++11 /usr/include system. There is = an undefined function logged in config.log and configure bombs. The attached p= atch is a brute-force fix that technically doesn't break anything for clang or o= ther arches, but it doesn't get to the root of the issue. What I would like to find out is what -I flags and -D flags I should add to CXXFLAGS in my make.conf to fix this fragile C++ environment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213768-25061-QfUGVb13Kf>