From owner-freebsd-net Mon Apr 23 21:57:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from cody.jharris.com (cody.jharris.com [205.238.128.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C470E37B43C for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:57:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick@rogness.net) Received: from localhost (nick@localhost) by cody.jharris.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f3O65mA28245; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:05:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nick@rogness.net) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:05:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Nick Rogness X-Sender: nick@cody.jharris.com To: Peter Brezny Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: three nics, two networks, simple routing problem...i think. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Peter Brezny wrote: > The excerpt from my rc.conf mostly illustrates what I'm trying to do. > I want to connect a host (10.30.1.15) to xl1 So that I can partition > it's traffic from that of the lan connected to xl2. > > 10.30.1.1 GW----xl0 10.30.1.30 FW xl2----10.20.30.1 LAN > | > xl1 > | > | > 10.30.1.15 FW ----- 10.20.15.1 LAN > > However, with my current conf files, I can't even ping xl1 from the > box it's in. I can manually add a route, but I still can't ping the > interface itself. > > What have I missed? xl0 and xl1 are part of the same network...that is a no-no unless you are bridging. Nick Rogness - Keep on Routing in a Free World... "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message