From owner-freebsd-security Sat Dec 23 2:18:23 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 02:18:21 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (unknown [198.79.110.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EAC37B400 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 02:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA21472; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 02:19:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200012231019.CAA21472@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 02:18:59 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? To: mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: jessem@spammie.svbug.com Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 22 Dec, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > >> The question asked is: why you believe ssh is beter >> than say telnet. Or what advantages SSH has in general. > > I think the expected advantages are well known. A better question > might be "Are you suggesting ssh is no more secure than telnet and > if so, why?" > For an answer to that question, you'd need to attend my talk or read the notes, which will be posted some time after the talk. Do you have an opinion about SSH? or is there some substantial statement you'd like to make in that regard? Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message