Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 May 1997 13:35:24 -0400
From:      "Donald J. Maddox" <dmaddox@scsn.net>
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: shutdown
Message-ID:  <19970511133524.17933@cola65.scsn.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970511124125.248D-100000@Journey2.mat.net>; from Chuck Robey on Sun, May 11, 1997 at 12:42:44PM -0400
References:  <13277.199705111623@nice.csv.warwick.ac.uk> <Pine.BSF.3.91.970511124125.248D-100000@Journey2.mat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 11, 1997 at 12:42:44PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 1997, Mr M P Searle wrote:
> 
> > Would it break anything if the X server was kept running while shutting down?
> > (Nothing else, just that one process. The root window is set before starting
> > 'halt' - and maybe set again after the 5 seconds.)
> > 
> > Michael, who has too much free time...
> 
> I think that would mean that /usr couldn't be dismounted, which would mean
> that you wouldn't get a clean shutdown on the /usr filesystem, and it 
> would end up being fsck'ed on startup.  I have a big disk, and wouldn't 
> want to have to wait on that all the time.

FWIW, I use 'shutdown -h now' all the time from an xterm, and have
never observed any ill-effects...  Everything appears to shut down
cleanly, and all the FSs apparently dismount just fine.

YMMV :-)

-- 


                                            Donald J. Maddox
                                            (dmaddox@scsn.net)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970511133524.17933>