Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Dec 2023 22:27:00 +0200
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: e3cbc572f154 - main - kern/subr_trap.c: repair the HPTS performance hack in userret()
Message-ID:  <ZW42FH2wpsJInlUI@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <202312041859.3B4IxVcB043749@gitrepo.freebsd.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 06:59:31PM +0000, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> The branch main has been updated by glebius:
> 
> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=e3cbc572f1541fdc18be9971d23e210d5018e662
> 
> commit e3cbc572f1541fdc18be9971d23e210d5018e662
> Author:     Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
> AuthorDate: 2023-12-04 18:19:46 +0000
> Commit:     Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
> CommitDate: 2023-12-04 18:19:46 +0000
> 
>     kern/subr_trap.c: repair the HPTS performance hack in userret()
>     
>     It wasn't functional as subr_trap.c doesn't include opt_inet.h.  Put a
>     better comment provided by gallatin@ in place of the old one.  The idea
>     is to use userret() as a cheap place to call a soft clock.  This approach
>     saves CPU on busy machines and saves power on idle machines.
>     An alternative would be to constantly schedule callouts.  Running with
>     neither callouts nor the soft clock ruins HPTS precision.
Can this be converted to AST, and scheduled as needed, instead of current
ugliness?


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZW42FH2wpsJInlUI>