From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 17:49:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E3016A427 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851A343D45 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id B1A3E312F9; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:49:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:49:17 -0500 (EST) From: Ensel Sharon To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: do known issues exist when snapshots used with quotas ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:49:18 -0000 I have read and re-read the recent discussions about snapshots, their quirks, etc. I am really getting some bad behavior out of a system using multiple snapshots and the only recent change was the addition of user/group quotas on that filesystem. So ... no need for real details (unless you feel charitable enough to give them) - just the quick question: are there any known issues / suspicions / hunches / lore about bad things happening when snapshots are combined with quotas ? (running 6.0-RELEASE) thanks again.