From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun May 26 15:16:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA25542 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 26 May 1996 15:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA25522; Sun, 26 May 1996 15:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id SAA03237; Sun, 26 May 1996 18:16:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, hsu@clinet.fi, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/403 In-Reply-To: <199605262208.PAA24432@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 26 May 1996, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >Synopsis: FreeBSD 1-compiled tcsh, bash and zsh binaries dump on vt102 > > > >State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > >State-Changed-By: scrappy > >State-Changed-When: Sun May 26 14:47:01 PDT 1996 > >State-Changed-Why: > >binary incompatibility problem between FreeBSD 1.x and FreeBSD 2.x > >that recompiling applications under new environment solves > > Don't we care about binary compatibility with 1.x? The PR was a year old this month (May 13th, 1995)...nobody *seemed* to care about it when the PR was reported, which, I think, would have been the time to worry about it as ppl were just switching up from 1.x to 2.x, no? So far, I've found no other reports of a similar nature, and this one dealt with an aspect of the system that merely required a 'make world' to fix...should it be reopened and assigned to someone? :( Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org