From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 11 1: 3:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D44237B406 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.identd.net (matrix.identd.net [64.172.21.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3072943E4A for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:03:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: (qmail 24908 invoked by uid 1007); 11 Dec 2002 09:03:33 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:03:33 -0800 From: Mike Makonnen To: Brad Knowles Cc: Gordon Tetlow , "Daniel C. Sobral" , current@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, Doug Barton Subject: Re: RC NG, ntp and routed Message-ID: <20021211090333.GB24584@matrix.identd.net> References: <3DF4996E.1040706@tcoip.com.br> <20021210024350.GC16008@matrix.identd.net> <20021210162208.GJ45512@roark.gnf.org> <3DF61DE4.9070205@tcoip.com.br> <20021210225014.GA22267@matrix.identd.net> <20021211002318.GT45512@roark.gnf.org> <20021211054754.GA23972@matrix.identd.net> <20021211063348.GU45512@roark.gnf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/4.7-STABLE (i386) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:17:50AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: >=20 > I believe that DISKS should be split into DISKS_LOCAL and=20 > DISKS_NETWORK. This allows us to get NETWORKING going after=20 > DISKS_LOCAL and before DISKS_NETWORK.=20 Don't over-engineer it. This is the order it is done in now. The barier scripts are supposed to be major milestones. With your suggestion DISKS_{LOCAL,NETWORK) would each have _only_ one dependency (mountcritlocal and mountcritremote, respectively), so what would be the point then? > We may also want to split=20 > NETWORKING into INTERFACES and ROUTING (and higher level networking),=20 > in case there is anything that we might need to slide in-between. We=20 > might even need to split NETWORKING into three parts. I think the current barrier scripts plus Gordon's suggestion to include routing in NETWORKING works ok. However, improvements to /etc/rc.d/network1 to allow bringing up/down the interfaces individually would be nice. Cheers. --=20 Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC= 68B9 --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE99v9j2uHir9vMaLkRAoSyAKCyCST8qQplGu7IhY89sYS7o4zqUQCglVdG Vc6esxYxsW5YSDY85OOLDG0= =0je+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message