From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 02:40:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1137516A4BF for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 02:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9203E43FFD for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 02:40:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h829eEUp008077 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 02:40:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h829eDsS008075; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 02:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 02:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200309020940.h829eDsS008075@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Lars Thegler" Subject: Re: ports/56163: [PATCH] textproc/p5-XML-SimpleObject: fix bento build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lars Thegler List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:40:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/56163; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Lars Thegler" To: , Cc: Subject: Re: ports/56163: [PATCH] textproc/p5-XML-SimpleObject: fix bento build error Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:34:48 +0200 >I have a similar patch for this problem, which also passed portlint >check and do the right thing on the fly. How about this one? I agree - much neater. But if you add "CONFIGURE_ARGS+= DIR='Enhanced'", won't you have to fix the pkg-plist as well? >I'll create a slave port for XML::SimpleObject::LibXML separately: I noticed that the author has made a separate module for XML::SimpleObject::LibXML. Maybe you should port that, instead of making it a slave of this port. By the way, is the PORTREVISION bump really needed? Exisisting installations will work anyway, won't they? Or is this to force bento to upgrade? /Lars