Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 21:42:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: jgrosch@ispchannel.com Cc: "Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson" <insane@lunatic.oneinsane.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lizard... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907012142030.7292-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <19990701202919.A22943@gdead.adm.ispchannel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Jul 1999, Josef Grosch wrote: > I have done installs on FreeBSD, Redhat, HP/UX, and Solaris and I have to > say that Redhat is very confusing. FreeBSD does have it's warts but it is > better than Redhat. HP/UX and Solaris also have their problems, just ask > Nicole Harrington how she liked installing Solaris on an X86 box, but they > are better than FreeBSD but not by as much as you would think. HP/UX > install looks a lot like FreeBSD but not as limited as FreeBSD. The ability > to have more than 2 buttons on the screen and too be able to backup is a > major blessing. Uh, the Solaris packaging crap *is* a wart. It won't even work on a tarball.. The FreeBSD makefile mess could be extended to be about as "flexible" as the Solaris gunk. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907012142030.7292-100000>