From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 21 12:27:27 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C0E52D;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:27:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DE3FBD;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:27:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igcqo1 with SMTP id qo1so7775935igc.0;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2015 05:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=YPvNAe+nf6GO8dJbx1aoFJU2oUoX3wdchMyiivWdUHA=;
 b=bZOBXQNiBC8HX+XIdVDqv5CkeLT7dNbMbdXWrSot1NlIoU0fMTJRCSGQhDEMhkNjAb
 To3/P+E1g0U8eaJBjODRYUC4HvUAtW22G3B0BI46hWiMnJ8dV96bPrce1o5JvSidWf8r
 QGW1kyX7DCT8iTPr7yh1b6DJnTZ6RLAsgzh3IkH3V6fwso2jfaSF/yQw1nRDT2K7H380
 LQ+MO2QpVEy8j5Zgw1h3QGm6BrlOzF7s9J1TTc2iCmjBi2vI3l4ORQU0toQrzP7BujI0
 TK9PHQn3Q4j1Icbtyvb/NLSFRe1YWz/Z9yKsBamdGXrzQvzt089xkPMWv3oUp3yTazIf
 BHtQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.34.210 with SMTP id i201mr34136803ioi.1.1426940846285;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2015 05:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.156.75 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 05:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <550AD6A3.1020406@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CAFMmRNypU_Y9UKDwpiRtedOCeCPQFOsVuswN0-rn3EmVykTAYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2085699.T9kJlc0rkf@ralph.baldwin.cx>
 <CAFMmRNyYng0dai73KW9P1G+wqG=fvbhNpT-dRd9MHTeAK7wZzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3923303.nkjJO958qy@ralph.baldwin.cx>
 <CAJ-VmokQ9AjScMw0bYHZRW8C6nLJQPSp0aqfYBH0=CL1EOC5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <550A0B53.9020201@freebsd.org> <550AD6A3.1020406@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:27:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFMmRNwrxdX9DdtAPRFhhrt3V=Uf6z-xqad4rri4e87-VzHaVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What parts of UMA are part of the stable ABI?
From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:27:27 -0000

I've put the full patch to convert uma_malloc and uma_free to accept a
vm_size_t up for review[1].  It ended up being more extensive than expected
as a fair number of places do use uma_set_allocf().  I do plan on MFC'ing
this patch.  This survive a make tinderbox (ignoring some vt-related LINT
kernel build failures)

I haven't attempted converting the uma ctors, etc over to vm_size_t yet,
but I do plan on doing that still.

[1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2106