From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 11 13:52:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17836 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 11 May 1998 13:52:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from px.f1.ru (px.f1.ru [194.87.86.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA17806 for ; Mon, 11 May 1998 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from am@px.f1.ru) Received: (from am@localhost) by px.f1.ru (8.8.8/amsoft/1.0) id AAA18647 ; Tue, 12 May 1998 00:42:34 +0400 (MSD) From: Andrew Maltsev Message-Id: <199805112042.AAA18647@px.f1.ru> Subject: Re: SCSI problems? In-Reply-To: <9805111615.ZM3202@beatrice.rutgers.edu> from "Allen Smith" at "May 11, 98 04:15:25 pm" To: easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu (Allen Smith) Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 00:42:34 +0400 (MSD) Cc: tim@futuresouth.com, bofh@terranova.net, greg@uswest.net, am@f1.ru, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: am@f1.ru Organization: F1 communications X-Phone: +7-086-229-9988 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > On May 11, 1:43pm, Tim Tsai (possibly) wrote: > > We haven't seen any of the Adaptec problems since we turned off all > > the AHC_ options in the kernel configuration file. > > Aren't those for EISA, not PCI devices in the first place? That's what > the comments in LINT seem to indicate. I've also got an 2940UW, > without any AHC_ options, and it hasn't been causing any problems - > then again, the machine hasn't been up and running very long. Hm.. Powered off it will cause even less problems. Without tagging it's too slow for UW and good HD.. Btw, I see no more of that disturbing messages when I added AUTO_EOI1 and BOUNCE_BUFFERS which I lost during upgrade.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message