From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 6 04:13:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93937B401 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 04:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92554401A for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 04:13:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8632C66E3D; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 04:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E31CABBA; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 04:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 04:13:36 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Matt Douhan Message-ID: <20030706111336.GA18667@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <3F0768D7.8020402@swbell.net> <3F07B0BC.4030502@swbell.net> <20030706052044.GA16999@rot13.obsecurity.org> <200307061057.09092.mdouhan@fruitsalad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307061057.09092.mdouhan@fruitsalad.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Andy Doerr cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: tcl8.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 11:13:44 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Matt Douhan wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > On Sunday 06 July 2003 07.20, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > OK, thanks for clarifying. Assuming that tcl8.4 is considered by the > > developers to be the current "stable" release (which I think it is), > > we should indeed try to migrate 8.3 ports to 8.4. Some of them will > > probably require changes. Would you be able to work on this? >=20 > when migrating these ports, is it prerred to email the patches to the=20 > maintainer or to send-pr them, or whats the preferred procedure? >=20 > I have done expect and mysqltcl and are working on the others If there's a maintainer, email them for review (they may ask you to submit a PR with the patch and a note that there is maintainer approval). If not, then just send-pr directly. Kris --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/CARgWry0BWjoQKURAhiDAKCllr/u00/oxWpYsMpFGSOoBa5flACgikkp auH5n0ZlMFG6w8JHRDngOjQ= =nrrP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--