From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 13:20:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A4E106567B; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAAC8FC23; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id m38D87ch025580; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:08:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:08:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:08:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Alexey Dokuchaev In-Reply-To: <20080408090759.GB83752@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <200804080033.m380XK19007886@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080408090759.GB83752@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gnat/files patch-ab X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:39 -0000 On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:33:20AM +0000, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> deischen 2008-04-08 00:33:20 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Added files: >> lang/gnat/files patch-ab >> Log: >> Use setenv to add an environment variable instead of putenv. In 7.0, >> putenv() does not copy the supplied environment stringi, but gcc/gnat >> was free()ing the memory expecting that it would be copied. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.7 +20 -0 ports/lang/gnat/files/patch-ab (new) > > It is strongly discouraged to name new patch files as `patch-??', we > prefer `patch-path_to_the_file' pattern nowadays (for a while already, I > should say). Yes, I've seen that, but this port uses patch-?? and I wanted consistency. -- DE