Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:45:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com> To: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> Subject: Re: About wayland Message-ID: <1752452512.854228.1587559555782@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <f7b74683-11a4-22cd-5c36-e7476eaf3d86@qeng-ho.org> References: <20200421175910.GB62660@mithril.foucry.net> <2374cb33-48f6-4bac-54ca-ca8aedd4650f@list.199903.xyz> <f7b74683-11a4-22cd-5c36-e7476eaf3d86@qeng-ho.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm just throwing this out there.....
It's created under the MIT license.
In Massachusetts, there are two adjoining towns.... Wayland and Weston.... Wayland is the infrastructure and Weston is the compositor.
Could be?
Paul
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020, 7:40:04 AM EDT, Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> wrote:
On 22/04/2020 01:22, Philip wrote:
> Just curious, who is Wayland? a people name?
I have a vague recollection it was named after Wayland the Smith
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_the_Smith).
--
Fat Earther: One who believes the world is round but has put on too
much weight round the middle.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 22 15:00:18 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B472B723B
for <freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:00:18 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from news@mips.inka.de)
Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de
[IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496kBQ28cDz4MJ7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from news@mips.inka.de)
Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1])
by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5)
id 1jRGqx-00032s-It; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:59:55 +0200
Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03MEtg0F071332
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:55:42 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 03MEtgTr071331
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:55:42 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from news)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Newsgroups: list.freebsd.questions
Subject: Re: find(1) removes as it should a directory, but after this it
complains about
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:55:42 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnra0mne.2527.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References: <20200420081627.GA30229@sh4-5.1blu.de>
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 496kBQ28cDz4MJ7
X-Spamd-Bar: +++
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when
checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.63 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org];
TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[];
NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.990,0];
NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.998,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de];
R_SPF_NA(0.00)[];
FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de];
R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE];
FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de];
IP_SCORE(0.44)[ip: (1.17), ipnet: 2a04:c9c7::/32(0.59), asn: 202113(0.47),
country: DE(-0.02)]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:00:18 -0000
On 2020-04-20, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
> I've stumbled over something with find(1) which I would call a bug:
>
> $ mkdir foo
> $ find foo -type d -execdir rm -rv {} \;
> foo
> find: foo: No such file or directory
find(1)...
* sees the directory entry "foo";
* evalutes the expression for it, which as a side effect executes
an action;
* tries to recurse into "foo", since it is a directory.
That's perfectly reasonable. find(1) can't know that the action
removed the directory. If your exec removes a directory, you should
tell find(1) to not recurse into it:
$ find foo -type d -prune -execdir rm -rv {} \;
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1752452512.854228.1587559555782>