Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:54:02 +0200 From: Xavier Beaudouin <kiwi@oav.net> To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Netra T1 105 hme0 woes ? Message-ID: <72BED2C2-2429-11D9-B165-000A958871B8@oav.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there, I am experimenting some woes about hme0 and Netra T1 model 105. It is mostly working like a charm, but when I setup in /etc/rc.conf 100 Full-Duplex operation mode (/sbin/ifconfig hme0 media 100BaseTX mediaopt full-duplex) the interface seems to not send any packets on the network. But if I set as autodiscovery mode and after (in rc.local for example), the interface works like a charm... It doesn't seems to be a bug inside hme drivers, but some strange arch on theses boxes : ---//--- (extract of /var/run/dmesg.boot)--- hme0: <Sun HME 10/100 Ethernet> mem 0xe0000000-0xe0007fff at device 1.1 on pci1 miibus0: <MII bus> on hme0 ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto ukphy1: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> on miibus0 ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto hme0: Ethernet address: 08:00:20:d9:d3:b0 hme0: if_start running deferred for Giant hme0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sym0: <875> port 0xc00000-0xc000ff mem 0xe000a000-0xe000afff,0xe0008000-0xe00080 ff at device 2.0 on pci1 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking sym0: [GIANT-LOCKED] hme1: <Sun HME 10/100 Ethernet> mem 0xe0010000-0xe0017fff at device 3.1 on pci1 miibus1: <MII bus> on hme1 ukphy2: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> on miibus1 ukphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto hme1: Ethernet address: 08:00:20:d9:d3:b0 hme1: if_start running deferred for Giant hme1: [GIANT-LOCKED] ---//----- As you can see there is *two* media interfaces on hme0 (ukphy0 and ukphy1)... I think that the system may take the first media interface that is not connected (or unexistant) on this platform. Note that when opening this box, I can find a ethernet port near the CPU... Maybe this port is the ukphy0 and it is desactivated per default on Solaris ? Thanks for any advices about that ... (do I need to send-pr about that ?) /Xavier -- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/ Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72BED2C2-2429-11D9-B165-000A958871B8>