Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 14:30:49 +0530 From: Alwin Doss <alwindoss@outlook.com> To: FreeBSD Database <freebsd-database@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: FreeBSD's very own desktop environment Message-ID: <BAY002-W16A44E85B02C16EBDA3C43AA890@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <BAY002-W16768FCDE9171D61FF3643AA890@phx.gbl> References: <BAY002-W16768FCDE9171D61FF3643AA890@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Users=2C =20 Please ignore my earlier email to the mailing list freebsd-database@freebsd= .org=2C it was intended for freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org=20 Sorry for the spam =20 regards=2C alwin =20 From: alwindoss@outlook.com To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD's very own desktop environment Date: Sun=2C 7 Oct 2012 14:20:07 +0530 Hi All=2C =20 Having a good weekend??? Let me not make it boring I will get straight to t= he point. =20 I have read in FreeBSD documentation=2C while comparing with the Linux kern= el we claim FreeBSD to be a complete operating system which provides not ju= st the kernel but also other utilies surrounding the kernel making it a com= plete operating system. My question is "Why doesn't FreeBSD have it's own desktop environment" some= thing like what Ubuntu Linux is trying to achieve with their Unity Desktop = environment. In doing so we will carve a niche for ourselves in the end user space. =20 What does the forum have to say about this? =20 Regards=2C Alwin =
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY002-W16A44E85B02C16EBDA3C43AA890>