From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 29 16:18: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dt014n8c.san.rr.com (dt011n66.san.rr.com [204.210.13.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5F914E38 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:17:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by dt014n8c.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA35069; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:17:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:17:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug X-Sender: doug@dt014n8c.san.rr.com To: Ben Rosengart Cc: Harold Gutch , Marcel Moolenaar , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Harold Gutch wrote: > > > I interpreted the way of currently handling things (build the > > kernel first, then the userland) to be a _temporary_ solution, > > that Marcel was working on being fixed. If this is not the case, > > then I agree with you. > > If I understand correctly, it only needs to be done once per system, but > it makes no difference whether it happens on a given system now or six > months from now. Yes, if I understand Marcel correctly from this moment forward everyone who upgrades from any version of freebsd prior to today's -current will have to build the kernel first. Doug -- "Stop it, I'm gettin' misty." - Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message