From nobody Thu Nov 27 15:53:47 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-virtualization@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dHLZQ6mKKz6HV8J for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R12" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dHLZP644Dz42Nv for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.18.1/8.17.2) with ESMTPSA id 5ARFrlNf083015 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:53:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <881d8062-81b1-4a56-9296-e7852d226726@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:53:47 +0100 List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-virtualization List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bhyve + swtpm + W11 Content-Language: en-US Cc: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org References: <031fe2e6-eae6-4d4a-8bce-cd7eadd0b5a6@netfence.it> From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.84 / 15.00]; MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.89)[-0.888]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.53)[0.526]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4dHLZP644Dz42Nv On 11/27/25 15:41, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > Not sure about that issue since I don’t use Windows 11 (I stayed on 10) but I did do some experiments a few months ago and documented how to bypass all of those requirements (including TPM) when installing 11 on bhyve. Maybe skipping it altogether can help get your setup running. You can take a look at my post here: Thanks, but I know how to work around TPM requirements and I'm not interested in that. A TPM module costs less than 10 Euros, so I'd prefer to go "official" in that way. What I'm asking is if swtpm is a viable alternative or if it simply doesn't work. bye & Thanks av.