From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May 30 09:30:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA22808
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 May 1996 09:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA22790;
          Thu, 30 May 1996 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA20839; Thu, 30 May 1996 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: phk@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Somebody explain this to me again.. :-) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 May 1996 23:50:55 +1000."
             <199605301350.XAA23507@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 09:26:55 -0700
Message-ID: <20836.833473615@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The compiler should probably be in lib-tools.  Then to ensure that a
> stable version of it gets built, you could blow it away instead of the
> libraries.  It may take longer to rebuild than the libraries :-].

But it already gets blown away now in the tools target - no big
loss so far as I can see!

					Jordan