From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 10 12:49:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12879 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 12:49:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freebsd.myers.lan (toscana-209-79-56-101.snfc21.pacbell.net [209.79.56.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA12871 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 12:49:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from myers@iname.com) From: myers@iname.com Received: from iname.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.myers.lan (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA27174; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 12:46:42 GMT (envelope-from myers@iname.com) Message-Id: <199811101246.MAA27174@freebsd.myers.lan> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 12:46:40 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Simple NFS ACCESS caching, call for testers To: mike@smith.net.au cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199811101730.JAA03751@dingo.cdrom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Anything and everything is worthwhile. Please let me know the > vfs.nfa.access_cache statistics you see from your tests. Using a Solaris 2.6 server and running 'make tags' from NFS-mounted /usr/src: vfs.nfs.async: 0 vfs.nfs.access_cache_hits: 305092 vfs.nfs.access_cache_fills: 10489 That's a patch I believe I'll keep... -David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message