Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:44:58 +0200
From:      Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, le@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vinum, 5.x performance, ... (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: GNOME 2.12.1 has been merged into the ports tree)
Message-ID:  <20051107214458.30ca47f2@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051107145645.rav7hhtlsggk4sss@netchild.homeip.net>
References:  <20051106.131413.122956532.yasu@utahime.org> <1131176568.3960.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20051106.131413.122956532.yasu@utahime.org> <op.szszvnn89aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <ZhqaDxv9wJ@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <20051107111800.e199ndcxa8s0c444@netchild.homeip.net> <20051107122458.27a1f9e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051107145645.rav7hhtlsggk4sss@netchild.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:56:45 +0100
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:18:00 +0100
> > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:
> >
> >> > - and performaces is a nightmare on atapi harddisks
> >>
> >> AFAIR 4.x enables the write cache (bad if there's a power failure
> >> in the soft-updates case, since without native command queueing the
> >> drivers may reorder writes witout the possibility to notify
> >> soft-updates about it),
> >
> > So on NCQ disks write_caching should be safe from consistency
> > point-of-view ?
> 
> AFAIK: Enabling the write cache doesn't mean you use NCQ. So just
> because your drive is able to do NCQ, you shouldn't enable the write
> cache. If your controller, your disk and the OS is able to use NCQ,
> and you enable the use of NCQ, then everything is fine... assuming
> the drive doesn't lie to you. AFAIR there are or there where some
> drives which lie(d), but I don't remember the details.

And finding out the what disk and controller use NCQ _and_ are
supported by our drivers can be done how ?


Thanks,

-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051107214458.30ca47f2>