From owner-cvs-etc Tue Jul 30 00:48:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-cvs-etc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA27647 for cvs-etc-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA27642; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA12101; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:47:54 -0700 (PDT) To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) cc: bde@zeta.org.au, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:35:50 PDT." <199607300735.AAA03429@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:47:54 -0700 Message-ID: <12099.838712874@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I personally prefer my variable expansions to be *always* bracketed, whether they need it lexically or not, simply because it causes the variable names to stand out better in the text. Jordan > * the test is actually "X${foo}" != X"NO". The braces mainly waste space. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > This is quite inconsistent itself, shouldn't it be > > X"$foo" != X"NO" > > or > > "X$foo" != "XNO" > > if we are converting syntactically equivalent statments for > consistency's sake? > > Satoshi