From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri May 20 23:16:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1173FB43B62 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 23:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAD91D7E; Fri, 20 May 2016 23:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4KNGN1e041034 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 May 2016 16:16:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4KNGMD0041033; Fri, 20 May 2016 16:16:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 16:16:22 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Ian Lepore Cc: Warner Losh , freebsd-arm Subject: Re: upgrading arm6hf Message-ID: <20160520231622.GI1049@www.zefox.net> References: <20160519232102.GF1049@www.zefox.net> <20160520021633.GG1049@www.zefox.net> <20160520065945.GH1049@www.zefox.net> <1463776364.1180.340.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1463776364.1180.340.camel@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 23:16:26 -0000 On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 02:32:44PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 23:59 -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > Just did a reboot, uname -p reports > > root@www:~ # uname -p > > armv6hf > > > > FYI, this just got fixed with Warner's r300324 commit. I think only > your kernel needs rebuilding to make it right in userland too. > > -- Ian > Indeed, the kernel build completed with no special options, the install required DESTIR=/ but that's all. Will the DESTDIR requirement persist? After reboot the system says it's at r300334M, uname -p reports armv6, not armv6hf as before; is this expected? World and userland are now very slightly out of sync, so the next step is to update and repeat a complete OS build/install cycle. A few minutes into the process all seems well. Thank you very much! bob prohaska