From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 1 00:12:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A8716A46D; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from angel.ticketswitch.com (angel.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8342D13C4D5; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [10.50.50.2] (helo=smaug.rattatosk) by angel.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JKjVj-000IgK-Vv; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:12:04 +0000 Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.50.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by smaug.rattatosk with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JKjVj-000Fl3-Pp; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:12:03 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JKjVj-00091q-OY; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:12:03 +0000 To: chris#@1command.com In-Reply-To: <20080131125912.3c3ktim4xwkw44g8@webmail.1command.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:12:03 +0000 Cc: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [: -le: argument expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:12:05 -0000 > also already subscribed to the Apache dev list). My conclusion was that > the ultimate migration to 2, would be a lot smoother, and easier if moving > to 2.0 - the layout of both the server, and conf files are /very/ similar > (to 1.3). O.K., that makes a lot of sense - I can't remember how I did this, but I think I ended abandonning migrating the config files and simply re-wrote them to have the same functionality when I got a few spare dayes ;) > me to find an argument to move from 2.0. The current trouble I'm > encountering is clearly a PHP5 issue. As it isn't even touching the > Apache 2 install during the build process. I hope I've adequately > answered your question, and hope I wasn't /too/ verbose. :) NO, answered perfectly - am tyring to remmebr whether the reaosn I didnt like 2.0 was to do with php too though. It seems to cause some kind of woes every time I upgrade. You said you had to sup the ports tree BTW - does that mean you rebuilt every other port on the system ? -pete.