From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 26 10:54:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410BC1065684; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDA58FC12; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9039CB138; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:53:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7ftbIXMgtio; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:52:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from lev.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C159CB5DF; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:52:52 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by lev.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m9QAqqMR045922; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:52:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:52:52 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Martin Laabs Message-ID: <20081026105252.GA45809@freebsd.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: linux-libusb done X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:54:02 -0000 On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:49:02AM +0100, Martin Laabs wrote: > Hi, > > I've build succesfully an androgynous libusb. This is a libusb in > linux binary format with freebsd-like usb-access. (I use it to > run a jtag-debugging utility which is supplied as a linux > binary only.) > Unfortunately I had to patch the linux.ko module to support the > ioctl calls out of the linux application. > I can supply the libusb.so, a patch for the source of libusb > as well as the linux_ioctl.c on request. > Unfotunately I did not save the original linux_ioctl.c so I can not > publish a patch yet. (I'll do a cvsup these days ..) > > Anyone who wants to maintain such a port? great work martin! please show us the linuxulator patch and I'll see what I can do about it... roman