From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 06:20:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE66BB1398 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@mail.sermon-archive.info) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADE41F6D for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@mail.sermon-archive.info) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (unknown [71.177.216.148]) by zoom.lafn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DD1A34A882; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 23:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0 From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <20160808060501.GA90827@knossos> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 23:20:21 -0700 Cc: Doug Hardie , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <30C0616F-E3F0-4701-BD31-E8B83CA00D9E@mail.sermon-archive.info> References: <20160808042708.GA15144@knossos> <26DC9293-6228-463F-A924-82F807C3FF42@mail.sermon-archive.info> <20160808060501.GA90827@knossos> To: Zoran Kolic X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 06:20:23 -0000 > On 7 August 2016, at 23:05, Zoran Kolic wrote: >=20 >> The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update = completed and the server is running 11.0-BETA4. >=20 > I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch. > Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < something"?=20 > You saved me from installing from the start, which I dislike a lot. > Not right now. I will wait for a release. If I do it more freq, my > nodes would stop working, since they are not new (read old). No, you have to vi the file and go to approximately the location = indicated in the patch file and replace the one line. There are = comments in above that line which will match those in the patch to help = you find the right place. I suspect the provided patch is for the 10.x = version of that file.