From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 17 18:21:35 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1541065673
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:21:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marco+freebsd-current@lordsith.net)
Received: from maul.lordsith.net (maul.lordsith.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:330::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306EA8FC1E
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:21:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by maul.lordsith.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id E7122575477; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:21:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:21:33 +0200
From: Marco van Lienen <marco+freebsd-current@lordsith.net>
To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100717182133.GA63078@lordsith.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Marco van Lienen <marco+freebsd-current@lordsith.net>,
	Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <4C3C7202.7090103@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100717101459.GA13626@lordsith.net>
	<9E4FCF4C-7A69-426E-9F39-B5487D4CB07C@lassitu.de>
	<20100717105134.GB13626@lordsith.net>
	<AANLkTikusWLS-3lZpY62cw2XxTdAQTG5KtFfrU29hG_W@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikusWLS-3lZpY62cw2XxTdAQTG5KtFfrU29hG_W@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: LordSith.Net
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2
X-FreeBSD: RULEZ Them All
X-GPG-Fingerprint: A025 D8AA AC1B D2FC 380D  4FC1 8EA0 0BA8 8580 E6CB
X-GPG-Key: http://lordsith.net/gpgkey
X-Uptime: 8:16PM  up 6 days, 20:38, 6 users, load averages: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Marco van Lienen <marco+freebsd-current@lordsith.net>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:21:35 -0000

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:12:10AM -0700, you (Freddie Cash) sent the following to the -current list:
> >
> > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does not?
> > That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't fill up his raidz pool past the 3.56T.
> 
> You used different commands to check the disk space on OSol (zpool vs df).
> 
> Try the same commands on both FreeBSD and OSol (zpool and zfs) and
> you'll see the same results.

I guess you missed my original mail of this thread in which I also showed the output of 'zfs list -r pool2' on osol where clearly there is more available space shown then on FreeBSD.

% zfs list -r pool2                                                                                                                                   
NAME                                            USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT                                                                        
pool2                                          3.32T  2.06T  3.18T  /export/pool2

> 
> df works differently on OSol than it does on FreeBSD, you can't compare them.

HTH