From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 14:12:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EB8106564A for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5D68FC1E for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id JEBC1h0020EPchoA8ECJMq; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:12:18 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([67.180.84.87]) by omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id JECK1h00H1t3BNj8MECKPj; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:12:20 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8803102C19; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:12:20 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: "Vladislav V. Prodan" Message-ID: <20110809141220.GA14141@icarus.home.lan> References: <20110809131057.GA53580@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <20110809135212.GA13334@icarus.home.lan> <4E413EB0.5040108@ukr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E413EB0.5040108@ukr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs mirror reads only on one disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:12:22 -0000 On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:05:36PM +0300, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > 09.08.2011 16:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >Since I have a ZFS mirror setup I can test this. Let's take a look: > > > >ada1 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 > > Maybe it lies in the differences between the drivers ad and ada? ZFS would have to have code in it that differentiated between the two. A vdev is a vdev, so I don't see how this is a plausible explanation. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |