From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 14:16:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9F37B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43AFB43F75 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:16:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matthias.sz@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 2646 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Jun 2003 21:16:31 -0000 Received: from pD9E3CE78.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.6]) (217.227.206.120) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 23:16:31 +0200 From: Matthias Szupryczynski To: FreeBSD Ouestions In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1055798101.4191.26.camel@arwen.lindenstrasse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 16 Jun 2003 23:15:01 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: free? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: matthias.sz@gmx.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:16:35 -0000 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 23:09, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > Want to build a network appliance to run a proprietary firewall > > product and use FreeBSD as the operating system? Want to keep your > > modifications proprietary? Go right ahead -- Nokia did exactly that. > > What to lift the entire IP networking stack and use it in a new > > proprietary OS -- fine: that's what Microsoft did -- see the > > acknowledgements to Luigi Rizzo (FreeBSD committer: > > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/) and the University of California, > > Berkeley in > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/proddocs/standard/copyright.asp > > > The page you're looking for has been moved or removed from the site. Hmm, works fine here ... just about two seconds ago .. maybe the M$ webserver wasn't able to serve two requests at the same time ;) Matt