From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 02:54:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D60D16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890C913C45A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0G2sor3035381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:54:50 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0G2skn2022882; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:54:46 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:54:46 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801160254.m0G2skn2022882@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jalmberg@identry.com In-reply-to: <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> (message from John Almberg on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:48:32 -0500) References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:53 -0000 Hi, > 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 Just one comment, in my installation of SpamAssassin, it reports in syslog as spamd, not at rblsmtpd. This looks like logs from the rblsmtpd program that is not SpamAssasin. As some one mentionned, one way to prevent false positive and too agressive black lists is to use them through SpamAssassin only, where the black list score is only part of the spaminess. The draw back is that it puts more load the server and SpamAssassin that has to scrutinize every email, while dropping at the SMTP level is fast and uses very low resources. Bests, Olivier